California Tax on Cigarettes to Fund Anti­ Tobacco Ads Upheld

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Banta, 272 F. Supp. 2d 1085 (E.D. Cal. 2003); 72(4) U.S. Law Week 1060-61 (Aug. 5, 2003)

A California law that directed a state agency to develop a media program to discourage tobacco use with funding provided by a surtax on wholesale cigarette sales was upheld by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.  California voters in 1988 enacted a 25¢ per pack surtax with the revenue placed in a limited-use fund, a portion of which is used for the media campaign. Various tobacco companies challenged the law, asserting that the state annually spends $25 million on anti-smoking ads and the surtax compels them to fund speech with which they disagree...

Found in DMHL Volume 23 Issue 1

Previous
Previous

Residents of Community Program Entitled to Written Notice but Not Formal Hearing Prior to Discharge if They Pose Imminent Threat to Other Residents

Next
Next

Oklahoma May Violate the ADA by Imposing a Five-Prescription Per Month Cap on Medicaid Recipients Receiving Services at Home