Expert Testimony Based on Grisso Protocol Excluded Under Daubert and Confession of Fourteen-Year-Old Defendant Admitted

State v. Griffin, 831 A.2d 252 (2003)

The Appellate Court of Connecticut ruled a trial court properly excluded expert testimony regarding the nature of a juvenile's confession and concluded the juvenile had knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his privilege against self-incrimination.  The defendant, convicted of manslaughter, had been fourteen years of age at the time of the crime.  He attempted to suppress his confession at trial based on the testimony of a clinical psychologist...

Found in DMHL Volume 23 Issue 1

Previous
Previous

Prison Sentences Issued for Illegally Selling Prescription Drugs Over the Internet

Next
Next

Connecticut Supreme Court Applies Sell to Determination of Whether Defendant Can Be Forcibly Treated to Restore Competence