Ninth Circuit Refuses to Recognize "Dangerous Patient" Exception to Federal Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege

United States v. Chase, 340 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2003); 72(9) U.S. Law Week  1145-46 (Sept. 16, 2003)

The Ninth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that although therapists have a duty to warn authorities about patients' threats to inflict serious harm on others, this does not mean therapists may testify in subsequent federal court proceedings about these statements.  In this case, the defendant suggested during therapy sessions that he might injure FBI agents and other individuals. The psychotherapist alerted law enforcement personnel and, after the psychotherapist testified at trial about the defendant's threats, the defendant was convicted of threatening to murder federal agents....

Found in DMHL Volume 23 Issue 1

Previous
Previous

Psychiatrist as HMO Team Leader May Be "Treating Source" Whose Opinion Is Entitled to Greater Weight in Social Security Disability Determination Even Though Psychiatrist Has Minimal Patient Contact

Next
Next

HMOs Cannot Recover from Tobacco Industry Costs of Treating Members' Smoking-Related Illnesses