Low IQ Score a Relevant Mitigating Factor at Capital Sentencing, Even If It Is Not Directly Connected to the Crime and No Other Evidence of Impairment Is Presented

Tennard v. Dretke, 124 S. Ct. 2562 (2004)

In Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court established that a defendant's mental retardation is a potential mitigating factor at capital sentencing.  Under Texas law, however, a finding of mental retardation was limited to where there is subaverage general intellectual functioning, concurrent deficits in adaptive behavior, and onset during the early development period...

Found in DMHL Volume 24 Issue 1

Previous
Previous

Missouri Court Rules Individual Need Not Be Competent Before a Sexually Violent Predator Commitment Hearing Can Be Held; Supreme Court Declines Review

Next
Next

Andrea Yates Found Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity After Retrial