View Documents by Category:
- 8th Amendment 18
- ADA 19
- Armed Forces Court 1
- Behavioral Health 3
- CST 24
- Child Custody 11
- Civil Action 52
- Civil Commitment 28
- Civil Suit 3
- Competence 42
- Conditions of Confinement 8
- Confidentiality 9
- Criminal Defense 1
- DOJ 1
- Death Penalty 45
- Defense Counsel 25
- Discrimination 3
- Double Jeopardy 1
- Due Process 2
- Duty of Care 12
- Education 1
- Evaluation 3
- Excessive Force 12
- Firearms 5
- Fourth Circuit 18
- Guilty Plea 1
- HIPAA 6
- Immunity 29
- Ineffective Assistance 24
- Inmates 23
- Inpatient 13
- Insurance 17
- Intellectual Disability 34
- Interrogation 1
- Involuntary Commitment 26
- Involuntary Medication 32
- Jails and Prisons 27
- Jury Instructions 9
- Juveniles 30
- Law Enforcement 31
- Legislation 8
- Liability/Duty of Care 1
- MOT 1
- Medical Malpractice 1
- Mental Health 42
- Mental Health Experts 29
- Mental Health Providers 73
- Mental Health Treatment 1
- Mental Illness 3
- Military Court 1
Case Law
An inventory of Case Law Developments as recorded in issues of Developments in Mental Health Law.
Search for cases by key words:
Sexually dangerous individual; proof of likelihood to re-offend
In the Interest of Danny Robert Nelson, 896 N.W.2d 923 (N.D. 2017)
North Dakota Supreme Court orders release of person from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual after finding the evidentiary record fails to show that the person “has a present difficulty of controlling his behavior.” A dissenting opinion argues that the Court goes beyond the requirements of the law and impermissibly substitutes its judgment for that of the district court.
Found in DMHL Volume 36, Issue 3
Sexually violent predators; proof of likelihood to re-offend
In the Matter of the Detention of Troy Belcher, 399 P.3d 1179 (Wash. 2017)
Washington Supreme Court rules that an adult’s convictions as a juvenile can be “predicate offenses” supporting a finding that the person meets the criteria for continued civil commitment as a sexually violent predator.
Found in DMHL Volume 36, Issue 3
Violent sex offenders; due process
United States v. Maclaren, 866 F.3d 212 (4th Cir. 2017)
Fourth Circuit rules that a motion for discharge by a civilly committed sex offender under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act must be heard by the district court if, after meeting prescribed time requirements, the motion contains “sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim for discharge” that is “plausible on its face.”
Found in DMHL Volume 36, Issue 3
Sexually Violent Predators and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
In re Chapman, No. 27705, 2017 S.C. LEXIS 29 (Feb. 15, 2017)
The South Carolina Supreme Court rules that a person has a due process right to effective assistance of counsel during civil commitment proceedings for sexually violent predators, but that a claim contesting such commitment due to ineffective assistance of counsel must be raised in a habeas corpus petition as South Carolina statutory law does not provide for making such a claim on direct appeal.